Skip to main content

How do educational transfers affect child labor supply and expenditures? Evidence from Indonesia of impact and flypaper effects (De Silva & Sumarto 2015)

The Quantum Opportunity Program Demonstration: Implementation findings (Maxfield et al. 2003)

The influence of conditional cash transfers on eligible children and their siblings (Lincove & Parker, 2016)

Exploring the differential impact of public interventions on indigenous people: Lessons from Mexico's conditional cash transfer program (Lopez-Calva & Patrinos 2015)

Effect of the Mchinji Social Cash Transfer Pilot Scheme on children's schooling, work and health outcomes: A multilevel study using experimental data (Luseno 2012)

Education and child labor: Experimental evidence from a Nicaraguan conditional cash transfer program (Maluccio 2009)

Cash transfers and children's education and labour among Malawi's poor (Miller & Tsoka 2012)

Child schooling and child work in the presence of a partial education subsidy (de Hoop et al. 2017)

The impact of conditional cash transfers on the amount and type of child labor (Del Carpio et al. 2016)

Longer-term impacts of mentoring, educational services, and learning incentives: Evidence from a randomized trial in the United States (Rodriguez-Planas 2010)

Review Guidelines

Citation

Milgram, D. (2011). How to recruit women and girls to the science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) classroom. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 71(3), 4-11.

Highlights

    • The study's objective was to suggest successful strategies for increasing the number of women and girls in STEM classes.
    • The author used studies of other programs and lessons learned from personal experience to inform a set of suggested strategies for improving the recruitment of women and girls into STEM classes.
    • The author suggested that women and girls benefit from seeing female role models in STEM, receiving positive encouraging messages, and being assured that women in STEM can maintain a work/life balance. The author also described specific strategies that schools and programs should implement to improve recruitment of females, including reaching out to counselors and communicating the program’s emphasis on recruiting females, personally encouraging female students, developing outreach materials that display females and that incorporate the color pink, and taking into account how females’ perceptions of and motivations toward STEM differ from those of males.

Reviewed by CLEAR

May 2016