Skip to main content

How do educational transfers affect child labor supply and expenditures? Evidence from Indonesia of impact and flypaper effects (De Silva & Sumarto 2015)

The Quantum Opportunity Program Demonstration: Implementation findings (Maxfield et al. 2003)

The influence of conditional cash transfers on eligible children and their siblings (Lincove & Parker, 2016)

Exploring the differential impact of public interventions on indigenous people: Lessons from Mexico's conditional cash transfer program (Lopez-Calva & Patrinos 2015)

Effect of the Mchinji Social Cash Transfer Pilot Scheme on children's schooling, work and health outcomes: A multilevel study using experimental data (Luseno 2012)

Education and child labor: Experimental evidence from a Nicaraguan conditional cash transfer program (Maluccio 2009)

Cash transfers and children's education and labour among Malawi's poor (Miller & Tsoka 2012)

Child schooling and child work in the presence of a partial education subsidy (de Hoop et al. 2017)

The impact of conditional cash transfers on the amount and type of child labor (Del Carpio et al. 2016)

Longer-term impacts of mentoring, educational services, and learning incentives: Evidence from a randomized trial in the United States (Rodriguez-Planas 2010)

Review Guidelines

Citation

Starobin, S., & Bivens, G. (2014). The role of secondary school and community college collaborations to increase Latinas in engineering in a rural community. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2014(165), 17-23.

Highlights

  • The study described factors that might increase young Latinas’ enrollment in pre-engineering programs.
  • The authors reviewed a case study of middle and high school Latina students in the rural Midwest who were participating in a national education pipeline program intended to facilitate a pathway to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) degrees and careers.
  • The authors recommended the following for recruiting and retaining rural Latina students in a pre-engineering program: (1) have a program leader with a similar background to students, including a knowledge of culture and language, to facilitate better connections with them; (2) familiarize students with the physical space of higher education institutions to reduce intimidation; and (3) interact with students’ families to facilitate family support.

Reviewed by CLEAR

December 2015