Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 1 - 10 of 221
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of Project QUEST on employment and earnings over nine years. The study was a randomized controlled trial that used quarterly earnings data from the…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of expressive writing activities on the reemployment of people who had recently lost their jobs. The authors randomly assigned 41 people who had…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Bridges to Career Opportunities (BCO) program on employment.The study used a nonexperimental design to compare employment outcomes of BCO…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The evaluation’s objective was to examine the effects of the Summer Career Exploration Program (SCEP) on short-term earnings, employment, and other outcomes. SCEP offers youth job-related counseling…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to assess the impact of Accelerated Training for Illinois Manufacturing (ATIM) Program, a workforce training intervention, on education, employment, and earnings outcomes.…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of work incentives benefits counseling (WIBC) on employment and earnings for individuals with intellectual disabilities. The study used a…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of contribution matches, credit rebates, and advance notification on tax filers’ decisions about opening an individual retirement account (IRA) during…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of CareerAdvance on educational attainment and persistence, employment, earnings and economic well-being, and psychological well-being. The study used…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study examines the effectiveness of a prison work program, Prison Industry Enhancement Certification Program (PIECP), on employment, earnings, and recidivism. The author used a nonexperimental…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The report’s objective was to evaluate the impact of Career Academies on labor market and educational outcomes four years after participants’ scheduled high school graduation. Earlier reports…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
