Skip to main content

Related Studies

Displaying 1 - 10 of 93
1551

de la Mora, A., Callen, E., Kemis, M., & Abraham, W. (2017). 2016 PETC annual evaluation report, Eastern Iowa Community Colleges. Ames, IA: RISE.

  • Topic Area: Community College

Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis

Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence

Outcome Effectiveness:

Capacity building programs Community college education and other classroom training Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) programs

335

Yelamarthi, K., & Mawasha, R. (2010). A Scholarship Model for Student Recruitment and Retention in STEM Disciplines. Journal of STEM Education, 11(5 & 6), 25–32.

  • Topic Area: Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)

Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis

Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence

Outcome Effectiveness:

Youth programs Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) programs

428

McIntyre, R., Paulson, R., & Lord, C. (2003). Alleviating women’s mathematics stereotype threat through salience of group achievements. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 83-90.

  • Topic Area: Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)

Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis

Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence

Outcome Effectiveness:

Youth programs Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) programs Preventing discrimination

630

Blake, R., Liou-Mark, J., & Chukuigwe, C. (2013). An effective model for enhancing underrepresented minority participation and success in geoscience undergraduate research. Journal of Geoscience Education, 61(4), 405-414.

  • Topic Area: Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)

Study Type: Descriptive Analysis

Outcome Effectiveness:

Youth programs Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) programs

565

Rivera, M., Davis, M., Feldman, A., & Rachkowski, C. (2013). An outcome evaluation of an adult education and postsecondary alignment program: The Accelerate New Mexico experience. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 11(4), 105-120.

  • Topic Area: Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)

Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis

Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence

Outcome Effectiveness:

Youth programs Community college education and other classroom training Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) programs

466

Glasser, H. (2011). Arguing separate but equal: A study of argumentation in public single-sex science classes in the United States. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 3(1), 70-92.

  • Topic Area: Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)

Study Type: Descriptive Analysis

Outcome Effectiveness:

Youth programs Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) programs

529

Colvin, W., Lyden, S., & León de, l. B. (2013). Attracting girls to civil engineering through hands-on activities that reveal the communal goals and values of the profession. Leadership & Management in Engineering, 13(1), 35-41.

  • Topic Area: Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)

Study Type: Descriptive Analysis

Outcome Effectiveness:

Youth programs Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) programs

1483

Kansas State University Office of Educational Innovation and Evaluation. (2017). Butler Community College TAACCCT final evaluation report. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University.

  • Topic Area: Community College

Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis

Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence

Outcome Effectiveness:

Capacity building programs Community college education and other classroom training Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) programs

472

Denner, J., Werner, L., O’Connor, L., & Glassman, J. (2014). Community college men and women: A test of three widely held beliefs about who pursues computer science. Community College Review, 42(4), 342-362.

  • Topic Area: Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)

Study Type: Descriptive Analysis

Outcome Effectiveness:

Youth programs Community college education and other classroom training Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) programs

580

Yanowitz, K. (2004). Do scientists help people? Beliefs about scientists and the influence of pro-social context on girls’ attitudes toward physics. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 10(4), 393-399.

  • Topic Area: Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)

Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis

Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence

Outcome Effectiveness:

Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) programs Youth programs